Understanding Admissions Officers: The Human Side of Application Reading
Your application is read by real people with real constraints. Understanding their perspective, incentives, and challenges can transform how you approach your application.
Applicants often imagine admissions officers as gatekeepers judging them from positions of power. The reality is more complex—and understanding it can help you present yourself more effectively.
The Job of Admissions
Admissions officers aren't evaluating whether you deserve education; they're building a class. Their job is to:
- Fill seats with students who will succeed
- Maintain institutional priorities and values
- Create a diverse, interesting community
- Satisfy multiple stakeholders (faculty, administrators, donors, athletes, etc.)
- Predict which applicants will thrive and contribute
This framing changes everything. You're not begging for admission; you're offering to contribute to their community.
The Reading Process
Understanding how applications are read helps you communicate effectively:
Initial review:
- Often 8-15 minutes per application
- Focuses on key metrics and red flags
- Determines whether application advances
Committee discussion:
- For competitive applicants who pass initial review
- Multiple readers present and debate
- Context and advocacy can shift outcomes
Final decisions:
- Balance class-building priorities
- Make painful choices between qualified candidates
- Increasingly use holistic, contextualized review
At each stage, readers need clear, memorable, positive impressions. Confusion, ambiguity, or generic content works against you.
What Makes Applications Memorable
Admissions officers read thousands of applications. Most blur together. What stands out:
Memorable (positively):
- Specific, vivid details
- Unexpected perspectives or achievements
- Genuine voice and personality
- Clear intellectual passion
- Evidence of impact, not just participation
- Coherent application narrative
Memorable (negatively):
- Obvious exaggeration or fabrication
- Tone-deaf essays (privilege, arrogance, controversy)
- Mismatched application elements
- Errors that suggest carelessness
- Missing the point of prompts
Forgettable:
- Generic language and descriptions
- Activities without context or impact
- Essays that could describe any applicant
- Following expected patterns perfectly
Your goal: be memorably positive.
The Advocacy Model
Many schools use an advocacy model where regional readers present and argue for applicants from their territory. Understanding this:
What helps advocates:
- Clear application narrative they can articulate
- Compelling story or hook
- Connection to institutional priorities
- Evidence supporting your potential
What hurts advocates:
- Complicated situations without explanation
- Inconsistent information requiring defense
- Nothing distinctive to argue for
- Red flags that require explaining away
Make your regional representative's job easy. Give them a clear case to make.
Institutional Priorities
Admissions officers serve institutions with priorities:
Common priorities:
- Academic quality metrics (for rankings and reputation)
- Diversity across multiple dimensions
- Athletic program needs
- Legacy and development interests
- Geographic representation
- Specific program enrollment targets
Variable priorities:
- New program launches needing students
- Donor interests in particular fields
- Faculty research needing undergraduate assistance
- Strategic initiatives (internationalization, STEM focus, etc.)
You can't know all priorities, but you can research public strategic plans and recent institutional investments.
The Compassion Factor
Admissions officers are generally empathetic people who chose this career because they want to help students. They:
- Read additional information sections carefully
- Consider context when evaluating challenges
- Give benefit of the doubt on ambiguous information
- Advocate for promising students from difficult circumstances
This doesn't mean they'll ignore weaknesses, but it does mean they're looking for reasons to admit, not reject.
What They're Tired Of
After thousands of applications, certain patterns exhaust readers:
Overused essay topics:
- Sports victories teaching teamwork
- Mission trips discovering privilege
- Immigrant grandparent stories (without unique angle)
- "I learned more from teaching than students learned from me"
- Overcoming procrastination or time management
Annoying application behaviors:
- Obvious thesaurus abuse
- Humble-bragging
- Listing achievements in essay form
- Mentioning school prestige as primary interest
- Essays that are clearly parent- or consultant-written
Red flags:
- Explanations that sound like excuses
- Blaming others for failures
- Inconsistencies between application elements
- Declining performance without explanation
You can write about common topics, but you need uncommon execution.
The Waitlist Psychology
Understanding waitlist dynamics helps if you're placed there:
Why waitlists exist:
- Enrollment management uncertainty
- Desire to keep options open
- Genuine interest in applicants who didn't quite fit
What waitlisted applicants should know:
- Many schools admit few or no students from waitlist
- Those admitted often share characteristics (legacy, specific majors, demonstrated interest)
- Updates and continued interest can matter
- Some waitlists are ranked; others aren't
If waitlisted, research the specific school's patterns and respond strategically.
The Human Element
Remember that admissions officers are people who:
- Have good days and bad days
- Read your application among dozens that day
- Bring their own perspectives and biases
- Genuinely want to find great students
- Make difficult decisions with incomplete information
This isn't license for excuse-making, but it should inspire:
- Making their job easier with clear, organized applications
- Writing essays a tired person would find engaging
- Being genuine rather than performing
- Showing respect in every interaction
What You Can Control
You can't control:
- Institutional priorities
- Competition in your applicant pool
- Reader mood or preferences
- Final committee decisions
You can control:
- Quality and clarity of your application
- Authenticity of your presentation
- Completeness of required materials
- Timing of submissions
- Demonstrated interest where it matters
- How you respond to decisions
Focus relentlessly on what you can control. Accept that uncertainty is inherent to the process.
The Post-Decision Relationship
However decisions go, admissions officers often remain resources:
- They can explain decisions if asked professionally
- They can advise on next steps
- They remember students who handled rejection gracefully
- Transfer applications come back to them
Handle all outcomes with dignity. The college process is not the last time you'll face institutional decisions, and how you respond to adversity reveals character.
The admissions process is intensely human—on both sides. Understanding the humans reading your application helps you connect with them more effectively.
Continue Reading
More articles you might enjoy
The Hidden Curriculum of Elite University Admissions
Beyond grades and test scores lies an unspoken set of expectations that top universities rarely articulate. Understanding this hidden curriculum can transform your application strategy.
Demonstrated Interest: What Actually Matters and What's a Waste of Time
Some schools track every interaction; others couldn't care less. Understanding which is which—and what truly signals interest—can meaningfully impact your admission chances.